The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 fitting multiple peaks to get fwhm and heights

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
smburu Posted - 10/24/2015 : 02:03:43 AM
Hi,
I am trying to fit a curve to my data in order to calculate the amplitude and the widths (fwhm) of the peaks.
I hope the attached image is viewable. I am using the Peak Analyzer in Origin Pro to fit peaks.
The problem I am having is that my data has asymmetric shape, with peaks of different sizes and shapes. I use the local max criteria to find the peaks and then try to fit it with a gaussian function.
I got the error message: "Fit did not converge - mutual dependency exists between parameters.You may have overparameterized the fitting function. Fixing one of them may eliminate this problem." Therefore, I fixed the all the x-centers of the peak locations. The result was a converged cumulative fit, whose individual fit peaks had a reasonable amplitude to my data. However, all the individual fit peaks had the same fwhm.
Therefore, I unfixed the peak x-centers and fixed the widths which all had similar values. The result was that the peak x-centers shifted slightly. I then unfixed the widths and fixed the x-centers which were slightly off. The result is in the image below, which is by far the best result I have for now.
I have tried various other methods but I have never had results that were good enough to report. It seems that the short peaks are the ones causing a problem. How can I solve this issue?
I would also like a method that I can save to quickly apply to about 30 other data sets that I have with similar but distinct assymetric peaks. I was also having a problem getting similar results using a saved analysis with this particular dataset.
Please help me.

Thanks,
~Sarah


Origin Ver. and Service Release (Select Help-->About Origin):
Operating System:
5   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
jasonzhao Posted - 10/27/2015 : 05:48:45 AM
Hello,

You can send the data to tech@originlab.com for a further check.

Best regards!
Jason
OriginLab Technical Service
smburu Posted - 10/26/2015 : 10:23:20 AM
smburu Posted - 10/26/2015 : 10:12:58 AM
This is the result that i get by following the instructions on the http://blog.originlab.com/graphing/add-peak-indices-and-peak-properties-table-after-peak-deconvolution link.
Note that the cumulative peak fit did not converge and the individual peaks give me results (fwhm and height) that are way off.

smburu Posted - 10/26/2015 : 09:52:00 AM
Dear Jason,

I had followed the instructions in the link in order to learn how to use the Peak Analyzer. The problem I had were the error messages that the fit did not converge. Therefore, I had to fix some variables.

Is there any other way that you can suggest for finding heights and fwhm?

Thanks,
~Sarah
jasonzhao Posted - 10/25/2015 : 10:41:28 PM
Hello,

For the multiple peaks fitting, please refer to the contents in links below:

http://blog.originlab.com/graphing/add-peak-indices-and-peak-properties-table-after-peak-deconvolution
http://www.originlab.com/doc/Quick-Help/peak-deconvolution


Best regards!
Jason
OriginLab Technical Service

The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000