The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 correlation coefficinet

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Tashira Posted - 11/26/2015 : 05:09:33 AM
Dear all,

I fitted my measurement data (two diagramms with three independent datasets each) with Modell ExpGro1.
For one diagramm I got for each dataset a correlation coefficient of 1.
For the second diagramm I got for each dataset a correlation coefficient and a standard error of 0. Here I masked one datapoint in each dataset.
Both resulsts seem not plausible.
Does anyone know, what to do?

Thanks in advance

best regards,

Tashira
4   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Tashira Posted - 12/18/2015 : 05:34:02 AM
Hi Hideo Fujii,

thanks for your tip.

I set the tolerance to 0.01 and the max. number of iterations to 100.
Therby, I got for D(CaCl2) and R(CaCl2)a correllation coefficient of 0.99999 and 0.99979, resp.
Unfortunately, this change of fit control does not affect all NaCl-Curves and µ(CaCl2). A further reduction of tolerance and max. number of iterations does not help, too.

I wonder, why visual the fitting curves match relatively good to the exp. data, but the correlation coefficients are so strange.

Do you have another idea, what I can do?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards

Tashira

Hideo Fujii Posted - 12/01/2015 : 4:34:43 PM
Hi Tashira,

It seems the fitting failed as the ExpGro1 model couldn't
reach converged within the given tolerance to your data.
Can you try to change the tolerance in NLFit tool at:
Settings tab> Advanced(in the left panel)> Fit Control> Iterations> Tolerance(in the right panel) to e.g., 1E-4 ?

--Hideo Fujii
OriginLab
Tashira Posted - 12/01/2015 : 06:40:45 AM
Hi Echo,

thanks for your answer. Here I send you my data:

NaCl:
c(NaCl) in mM D R µ
0 5,90E-02 9,51E-01 3,01E-04
5 5,58E-02 9,95E-01 1,08E-03
10 4,03E+00 6,91E+00 1,00E-10
20 1,33E+01 9,37E+01 4,30E-01

CaCl2:
c(CaCl) in mM D R µ

0 5,90E-02 9,51E-01 3,01E-04
0,2 6,96E-02 1,02E+00 1,08E-03
0,4 6,64E-01 2,34E+00 1,67E-03
0,6 2,05E+01 1,83E+02 6,70E-01


and the fitting results:




I hope, you can help me.

Best regards

Tashira
Echo_Chu Posted - 11/27/2015 : 04:15:19 AM
Hi, Tashira

Hard to say anything now base on your description.

Could you show us your data, your fitting result and correlation coefficient results? It should also help to show us the graph with data and fitted curves.

Echo
OriginLab Corp.

The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000