The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 Function of SWeibull2 model fitting

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
AJOKi Posted - 09/10/2018 : 09:45:58 AM
Hello,

I'm a new user of Origin, so far it's been very helpful to analyze my data however I'm not very good with math and I have some questions that I would like to ask about the Weibull function for data fitting.
I have some experimental data that I want to fit to a mathematical model, so far the best model is the SWeibull2 function, as it is shown by the R2, X2 and fitting curve that appears after analysis with origin.

In the information that appears about the model, it shows the sigmoidal function: Y = A-(A-B)*exp -(kx)^d and mentions that has four parameters. However, I've reading about the Weibull model and came across different equations for this particular cumulative function, for example Y = Y0*(1-exp –(t-T/a)^b), or Y = 1-exp-(x/lambda)^k or Y = 1-(1-g)*exp-(kx/t)^b (they look similar but the exponential core function is different and I haven't been able to transform one into the other).

I was wondering if you could explain to me or link to me a couple of references where is clearly explained and in simplified terms if possible, from which four parameter cumulative Weibull function Origin derivates its SWeibull2 function to fit a set of data?

Can you please explain step by stem parameterization to obtain Y = A-(A-B)*exp -(kx)^d ?

I understand that variables and parameter letters may change, and that the commonly referred "b" parameter in classical Weibull functions is the "d" parameter in Origin with the previous mentioned formula. If I were to write this formula on a scientific paper for the scientific community, Which form of notation is recommended?

I hope my questions are clear and I would appreciate very much any information you can give me.

Kind regards!

AJ-->thanks
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Hideo Fujii Posted - 09/27/2018 : 4:45:46 PM
Hi AJOKi,

I'm not a mathematician, but as far as I see that the standard form (F=1-exp(-(x/lambda)^k) in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weibull_distribution#Cumulative_distribution_function
(k is the shape parameter, and λ is the scale parameter) is the case when A(top asymptote)=1,
B(bottom at x=0)=0, and k=1/lambda in the Origin's formulation (y=A-(A-B)*exp(-(k*x)^d) ) in
https://www.originlab.com/doc/Origin-Help/SWeibull2-FitFunc .

I hope math people can give further comment.

--Hideo Fujii
OriginLab

The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000