| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| AKazak |
Posted - 10/15/2020 : 12:15:17 PM
OriginPro 2021 (64-bit) Beta 6 9.8.0.178
Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1
Greetings!
https://my.originlab.com/ftp/forum_and_kbase/Images/Exp2PMod1%20Test.opju
I fit an attached dataset with Exp2PMod1, but get the equation worse in terms of COD than that found by Excel 2013.
What would be a reason for this?
How do I improve fitting quality in Origin?
Thank you.
---
Andrey |
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| AKazak |
Posted - 10/16/2020 : 08:08:24 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Chris D
Please see my response to a forum post from a few years ago:
https://my.originlab.com/forum/topic.asp?topic_id=19889
If I apply your data to fit it with WolframAlpha method I mention in that post, I get identical results to the results you got in Origin.
exponential fit {0.1119,6.16622},{0.1939,6.83858},{0.3022,4.9636},{0.4974,3.65903},{0.761,4.25756},{1.0045,3.54405},{2.004,1.82635},{2.9988,1.53728},{3.9991,0.40259},{5.0028,0.1819}
Thanks,
Chris Drozdowski
Originlab Technical Support
Dear Chris,
Thank you for clarifying this.
Aaaaaa...
Excel again did something weird!
Relevant paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.10.020 describes polynomial trendline function flaws in Microsoft Excel...
---
Andrey |
| Chris D |
Posted - 10/15/2020 : 1:42:00 PM
Please see my response to a forum post from a few years ago:
https://my.originlab.com/forum/topic.asp?topic_id=19889
If I apply your data to fit it with WolframAlpha method I mention in that post, I get identical results to the results you got in Origin.
exponential fit {0.1119,6.16622},{0.1939,6.83858},{0.3022,4.9636},{0.4974,3.65903},{0.761,4.25756},{1.0045,3.54405},{2.004,1.82635},{2.9988,1.53728},{3.9991,0.40259},{5.0028,0.1819}
Thanks,
Chris Drozdowski
Originlab Technical Support
|
|
|
