| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| alliceinw0 |
Posted - 03/09/2024 : 5:04:56 PM
Hello,
I am noticing a mismatch between the real value of the scattering point in my plot and the y-axis. For example, my first scatter point's y-value is 2.7, but it is placed way higher than the 2.8 y-axis value in my plot. This is better illustrated in the attached image. Any possible solutions for this issue?
Thanks in advance! |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| alliceinw0 |
Posted - 03/12/2024 : 09:29:42 AM
quote:
Originally posted by minimax
Hi alliceinw0,
Aha, it is a kind of "magic" display...
The tick label now displays with 1 decimal digit only.
If you change it to show 2 decimals, you will see the "2.8" is in fact "2.75".
Thank you minimax, indeed changing the number of decimal points worked perfectly for me! |
| aplotnikov |
Posted - 03/12/2024 : 07:24:03 AM
quote:
Originally posted by minimaxFirstly, I do not see "lay -a" takes effect for Layer 8 (bottom-center) of user's project.
Right, I considered layer 5 only, my fault.
quote:
Originally posted by minimax
User's Layer 8 triggers the "discrepancy" since it sets the "Anchor Tick" option with 2.55 AND uses 0.1 as increment value.
Either removing 2.55 or changing 0.1 to be 0.15 can also workaround the display.
Indeed the current rescale logic is kind of magic (complicate).
Indeed it looks like a bug.  |
| minimax |
Posted - 03/12/2024 : 04:46:27 AM
Hi aplotnikov,
Firstly, I do not see "lay -a" takes effect for Layer 8 (bottom-center) of user's project.
i.e. after it is run, the mismatching still appears in 2023/2024.
User's Layer 8 triggers the "discrepancy" since it sets the "Anchor Tick" option with 2.55 AND uses 0.1 as increment value.
Either removing 2.55 or changing 0.1 to be 0.15 can also workaround the display.
Indeed the current rescale logic is kind of magic (complicate).
|
| aplotnikov |
Posted - 03/12/2024 : 04:37:14 AM
minimax,
After re-scale ("lay -a") I haven't found any discrepancies between worksheet data and axis ticks - all points have been plotted correctly. Seems, that the problem may occur if adding a plot to a layer in a specific way without automatic re-scale - I have no idea, which one exactly. |
| minimax |
Posted - 03/12/2024 : 03:20:58 AM
Hi alliceinw0,
Aha, it is a kind of "magic" display...
The tick label now displays with 1 decimal digit only.
If you change it to show 2 decimals, you will see the "2.8" is in fact "2.75". |
| alliceinw0 |
Posted - 03/11/2024 : 6:16:37 PM
quote:
Originally posted by aplotnikov
win -o Graph2 {doc -ef LP {lay -a;}}
I'm curious, what method have you used to plot the data?
I used the 9 by 9 panel option, and then, through the layer management menu, I moved and connected the top and bottom plots.
|
| aplotnikov |
Posted - 03/11/2024 : 5:08:27 PM
win -o Graph2 {doc -ef LP {lay -a;}}
I'm curious, what method have you used to plot the data? |
| alliceinw0 |
Posted - 03/11/2024 : 4:34:47 PM
quote:
Originally posted by YimingChen
What version of Origin do you use? And could you share your project file? Thank you.
James
Hi, I am using the 2023 version. https://my.originlab.com/ftp/forum_and_kbase/Images/Critical%20Points_ForOrigin.opju
Please find attached the project file. The points marked as CP E0 seem to be at the correct position. The problem is found for the points of CP E1 and CP E2.
Many thanks. |
| YimingChen |
Posted - 03/11/2024 : 08:45:37 AM
What version of Origin do you use? And could you share your project file? Thank you.
James |
