The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 Huge errors for the fitting parameters

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
twelvetang Posted - 12/14/2006 : 2:44:52 PM
Origin Version (Select Help-->About Origin): 7.5
Operating System: XP

I rescently use exponatial equation to fit a set of data. the fitting curve is quite well but the errors for the parameter X0 and A1 are too huge to accept.


Does it mean this function don't work? Do I just ignore it or try other parameters/functions?


Edited by - twelvetang on 12/14/2006 3:56:36 PM
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Mike Buess Posted - 12/15/2006 : 12:19:55 PM
R^2 = 1 and chi^2/DOF = 0 describe a perfect fit. A dependancy close to 1 signifies overparameterization... that parameter is not necessary. (You probably saw that when fitting to ExpGrow1.)

http://www.originlab.com/www/helponline/origin/The_Fitting_Session_Concept.htm


Mike Buess
Origin WebRing Member
twelvetang Posted - 12/15/2006 : 10:14:43 AM
Thank you very much, Easwar!
Now I used the expgro1 and get rid of the "huge error" problem.

In terms of the fitting accuracy, which factor (Dependency or R^2) whould describe better. For Dependency (comes with the error), is it the closer to 1, the better?

easwar Posted - 12/14/2006 : 4:27:40 PM
Hi,

This is because your data basically has zero offset in x and you are fitting with a function that has an offset parameter x0 which is not really required to fit this data. The minimization algorithm thus cannot find a unique value for all the parameters. There are many possible parameter values that give the same quality of fit - note that your final parameter value for x0 is 69.6 which is way off the zero x offset in your data, but that set of parameters still describes the data well - thus the function is essentially over-parameterized for your data. This is why, due to lack of a unique value/minimum for some of the parameters, the error on the parameter is too large.

You could try one of the following:
1> fixing your x0 parameter to a value such as zero (or close to zero if there is a physical reason to even have an x0 parameter in your equation)
2> place upper and lower bounds on your x0 parameter to restrict it to some physically acceptable/expected values
3> fit with another function such as expgro1 which is
y=y0+A*exp(x/t1)

Easwar
OriginLab


The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000