The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 NLSF & fit comparison

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Lemming76 Posted - 04/18/2007 : 08:29:41 AM
Origin Version: OroginPro 7.5G SR6 v7.5886 (B886)
Operating System: WinXP SP2

Hi!
I have 2 questions concerning the nonlinear fitting functionalities:

1. I used the NLSF wizard to fit curves to multiple datasets using separate parameter sets. I noticed that the errors reported for the parameters are different from when I fit each dataset separately. Is there any (statistical) sense behind this?

2. the fit comparison tool reports the F- and P-values for the F-test. The Origin reference states that F=((SSRcomb-SSRsep)/(DOFcomb-DOFsep))/(SSRsep/DOFsep) and according to what I've been reading elsewhere this should be the correct formula.
However, the tool actually calculates according to the formula F=((SSRcomb-SSRsep)/(DOFcomb-DOFsep))/SSRsep resulting in false test conclusions. Did I miss something or is this a software bug?

thanks for any replies!
Chris
4   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Wendy_Yang Posted - 05/06/2009 : 11:48:59 AM
Hi Deanna,

Thank you very much! I actually need to share all parameter except for one, so the global fit works for me. I decided to do residual plots for the individual datasets, and that seems to help with the visualization.

Thanks again,
Wendy
Deanna Posted - 05/04/2009 : 01:57:26 AM
Hi Wendy,

A global fit fits all datasets simultaneously. So there is only one chi square value.

If you do not need to share any parameters, please use the independent fitting mode instead. In this case, each dataset is fitted separately and there will be one chi-square value for each fitting (dataset).

Please read:
http://www.originlab.com/www/helponline/Origin8/en/mergedProjects/QuickHelp/QuickHelp/What_is_the_difference_between_global_fit_and_independent_fit.html

Deanna
OriginLab Technical Services
Wendy_Yang Posted - 04/30/2009 : 1:25:24 PM
Hi Larry, this is a quesiton related to your answer #1. Is it possible to obtain the Chi^2 value for each dataset when performing global fit? The result only contains the chi^2/DoF for all the datasets, but I would like to know how well the individual curves are fitted. I think I know how to calculate chi^2 by hand, but it will be very helpful if there is an easier way to get them from the software.

Thanks!
Wendy
larry_lan Posted - 04/18/2007 : 10:53:44 PM
Hi Chris:

1. This is because if you fit multiple datasets in one time, Origin actually performs "Global Fit". That is, it will treat all inputs as one curve, and generates one reduced Chi^2, DOF, etc. And the parameters error related to such values, so the result is different.

2. Yes, this is a bug. And we have fixed it in our next version.

Thanks

Larry
OriginLab Technical Services

The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000