The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 Fitting with equations within equations

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
a_user Posted - 08/14/1998 : 12:13:00 PM
Is it possible to define complex terms of an equation as letters or
such like instead of entering the terms directly into the equation, eg.
if I had an equation such as y=sqrt(D(D-2.Jq), where Jq= some other
equation such as Jq=4.((J.cos(pi.x))+(J'.Kq.cos(2.pi.x))), could I define
Jq somewhere instead of having to input it directly? I believe they have
such a system in Kalidagraph. If so, how many levels may you have, could
you then define Kq in such a manner and have a term within a term within
an equation?

PS I wouldn't study the equations above too intently, as they serve only
as examples, not as real equations.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Hideo Fujii Posted - 08/14/1998 : 12:16:00 PM
Re: Fitting with equations within equation

I think you can use the same technique to expand the "limitation on length of
equations" which was described by Ryan Toomey on April 27, 98 in this Forum.

The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000