The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 Confidence Limits

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Martin Syvertsen Posted - 08/18/1998 : 12:25:00 PM
Hi everybody.

There seems to be a problem with the upper and lower confidence limits
in the NLSF.

I have some measurements which according to theory should follow an
exponentially decaying trend.

When I fit the Origin function ExpDecay1, the curve fit works fine but
the confidence limits becomes just the same as the curve fit, even though
the fitted data is scattered around the fitted curve.

One solution is to define a new function y=A*exp(-B*x), this gives a
curve fit which is equal to ExpDecay1(with y0=0) and confidece limits
outside the curve fit.

Have I used the ExpDecay1 wrong, or is there a bug here? Is it maybe
possible to configure Origin somewhat different?

1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
a_user Posted - 08/18/1998 : 12:28:00 PM
Response to Confidence Limits

Martin,

In order to test your problem I opened up the project called Fitexmp1.OPJ.
This is a file located in the Samples folder inside your Origin directory
that exhibits an exponentially decaying behavior. I then opened up the
Non-Linear Curve Fitter (Analysis: Non-linear curve fit...) and selected
the ExpDecay1 function from the list of functions. This is the function
that has the formula y = y0 + A1*exp[-(x-x0)/t1]. I then assigned my
datasets (Action: Dataset) and fitted (Action: Fit) using the default
parameter initializations. The fit progressed normally. When I was happy
with my fit I plotted the Confidence Limits (Action: Results) and found
that the 95% CFs were plotted quite a ways away from the actual fit line.
I then looked at the parameters and saw that two of them were in a one-to-
one dependency which suggested to me that one of them was unecessary to
the fit. I therefore set x0 to 0 and fixed it. Once I did this I clicked
the iteration button again and then went back to Action: Results to re-
plot my Confidence Limits. At this point the CF lines plotted nicely.
The only time I found that they plotted right over the fit line was
when I reduced the percentage for the Confidence Limits from 95% to
something much lower. Is this what you did?

If this is not the way it happens for you, then how? Perhaps it would
be a good idea to explain the procedure that you went through. It
might also be helpful if this explanation were accompanied by your
data and sent to Technical Support at Microcal where we would be able
to assist you further. The necessary information is provided below.

Sincerely,
Ryan Toomey
Technical Services
Microcal Software, Inc.

Microcal Software Inc. Tel: +413 586 2013
One Roundhouse Plaza 800-969-7720
Northampton, MA 01060 Fax: +413 585 0126
tech@microcal.com http://www.microcal.com/


The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000