The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 Fitting Data with convolution to an Instrument Response Function

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Anti-Spam Code:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkUpload FileInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Calico Posted - 12/17/1998 : 10:21:00 PM
I've been trying to do a non-linear curve fit where I take a functional form, specify the initial parameters, convolute this with an instrument response function, and then compare the result with actual data. I've tried to do this with a y-script shown below:

Data1_D(x)=y0+A1*exp(-(Data1_A- x0)/t1);
fft.conv.convdata$=Data1_E);
fft.conv(Data1_D,Data1_C);
y=Data1_E(x);

...in this case column Data1_A are the x values, Data1_D the values generated from the functional form, Data1_C in the instrument response function, and Data1_E the convolution of the IRF and Data1_D. When I run this script, I keep getting (error 28037: poorly defined params or errors in defined formula).

Has anyone else tried to do this? I'd appreciate any help you guys could pass along...I work in femtosecond time-resolved spectroscopy so if any of you guys have dealt with this before or know anyone who has, I'd be much obliged for the info.

Thanx, CALICO


The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000