The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password? | Admin Options

 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 3D Surface Plot
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic Lock Topic Edit Topic Delete Topic New Topic Reply to Topic

tommeh!!

UK
Posts

Posted - 09/27/2004 :  11:11:27 AM  Show Profile  Edit Topic  Reply with Quote  View user's IP address  Delete Topic
Hiya, hope this hasn't been asked before, couldn't seem to find anything similar!!!

I've got some measured data in r, theta and z that i'd like to plot as a 3D surface. I can convert this to x, y and z in excel, but am having issues in the plotting of the graph, I think due to the small amount of data I have.

If I choose the "sparse matrix" option, Origin seems to discount some of the points, and then plots a series of spikes. If I try to convert the data to a matrix using the "random XYZ" option it seems to smooth out or change some of the points.

Is there a way of just interpolating between the data points??? even just straight lines would give a workable solution.

Many thanks,

tom
----

(Origin 7 running on Win XP)

easwar

USA
1965 Posts

Posted - 09/28/2004 :  10:02:07 AM  Show Profile  Edit Reply  Reply with Quote  View user's IP address  Delete Reply
Hi Tom,

Looks like what you have is random XYZ data - that is to say, the X, Y values do not have equal spacing.

Currently then the only available way of plotting such data as a grid is to first perform gridding on the random data to create a surface/matrix. There are five different gridding methods including two from the NAG library. All of these may create grids that do not go thru your data points, but are representative of the data, and so they can end up "smoothing" the data in essense, which is what you are seeing.

We do not currently have a 3D Spline surface generation capability which is what I think you want - be able to see the surface go thru all the data points. We will consider adding such in the future.

As for sparse matrix conversion, that also assumes regular spacing in x, y - just that some x,y pairs would be missing in the data. So if the data has random spacing in x,y then sparse is not suitable.

Thanks,

Easwar
OriginLab

Go to Top of Page

tommeh!!

UK
Posts

Posted - 09/28/2004 :  10:32:25 AM  Show Profile  Edit Reply  Reply with Quote  View user's IP address  Delete Reply
Hi Easwar,

Thanks for the quick response, a 3D spline surface would be ideal, but i guess i might be able to have a try at writing a spreadsheet which could simulate a straight line between points to increase the amount of data, which may then get round the problem.....

Cheers for the advice,

tom
----
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic Lock Topic Edit Topic Delete Topic New Topic Reply to Topic
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000