The Origin Forum
File Exchange
Try Origin for Free
The Origin Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Send File to Tech support
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password? | Admin Options

 All Forums
 Origin Forum
 Origin Forum
 HLN fitting about A and L
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic Lock Topic Edit Topic Delete Topic New Topic Reply to Topic

cchun1999

Taiwan
5 Posts

Posted - 07/14/2023 :  6:26:47 PM  Show Profile  Edit Topic  Reply with Quote  View user's IP address  Delete Topic
So far, I have been attempting to fit the magnetoconductivity at low temperatures using the HLN equation, but I have not been able to obtain satisfactory results.
In HLN fitting for topological materials, the theoretical range of A should be between -1 and 1. However, when applying the equation to my data, the obtained α values are far beyond this range, for example: A = -783.105, L = -8.5103E-9
The code I have been using is: y = (A * 1.23314709 * 10^-5) * (real_polygamma(0.5 + 1.64557041 * 10^(-16) / (x * L^2), 0) - ln(1.64557041 * 10^(-16) / (x * L^2))).
The quantity I have been fitting is y = delta_sigma (unit: 1/R = siemens), with x representing the magnetic field (unit: Tesla).
I would appreciate any insights or suggestions regarding potential mistakes in my approach. Thank you all.

My raw datas are below:
Magnet field(unit: Tesla)
9.0000734
8.5000344
8.0000727
7.500057
7.0000898
6.5000859
6.0000746
5.5000797
5.0000711
4.5000879
4.0000398
3.5000637
3.0000895
2.5000785
2.0000582
2.0000537
1.8000371
1.6000531
1.4000832
1.200041
1.0000408
0.8000755
0.599996
0.3999749
0.2000631
-0.0000023
-0.2000398
-0.4000308
-0.6000263
-0.8000266
-1.0000338
-1.2000387
-1.4000366
-1.6000228
-1.800023
-2.0000467
-2.0000676
-2.4999855
-3.0000268
-3.5000473
-4.0000281
-4.5000133
-5.000043
-5.5000332
-6.0000375
-6.5000418
-7.0000313
-7.5000313
-8.0000164
-8.5000227
-9.0000242

Delta_sigma(unit:siemens)
-0.002887489
-0.002687662
-0.002485256
-0.002280469
-0.002074338
-0.001868494
-0.001663777
-0.001462566
-0.001266492
-0.001077444
-0.000897571
-0.000729016
-0.000574062
-0.000435262
-0.000315078
-0.00031482
-0.000272575
-0.000233804
-0.000198404
-0.000166774
-0.000138783
-0.000114215
-9.2728E-05
-7.3475E-05
-5.2651E-05
0
-5.43256E-05
-7.43393E-05
-9.34855E-05
-0.000114852
-0.000139313
-0.000167332
-0.000198974
-0.000234167
-0.000272964
-0.000315264
-0.000315422
-0.00043529
-0.000573994
-0.000728615
-0.000897118
-0.001076791
-0.0012658
-0.001461805
-0.001662853
-0.001867149
-0.002073067
-0.002279108
-0.002483893
-0.002686309
-0.002885671

Edited by - cchun1999 on 07/14/2023 6:45:41 PM

YimingChen

1593 Posts

Posted - 07/17/2023 :  09:25:02 AM  Show Profile  Edit Reply  Reply with Quote  View user's IP address  Delete Reply
I obtained the same fitting result. Maybe you can double-check whether the units of the quantities in the fitting function align correctly with the units of the measurement data.

James
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic Lock Topic Edit Topic Delete Topic New Topic Reply to Topic
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Origin Forum © 2020 Originlab Corporation Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000